Animal models: trait or state measure? The test-retest reliability of the elevated plus-maze and behavioral despair.

1. The use of animal models in certain types of psychobiological studies (for instance, the relationship between anxiety and depression) requires that the behavior measured is stable over time. 2. The test-retest reliability of the elevated plus-maze indexes of anxiety and the immobility time in the behavioral despair were evaluated. 3. The behavior of two groups of drug naive mice was measured on two occasions on the same test, 1 week apart, on the elevated plus-maze or on the behavioral despair and then the intraclass correlation coefficient and kappa were calculated. 4. These behaviors showed a very low intraclass correlation coefficient (0.02 - 0.05) and low kappa (-0.08 - 0.21) in the test-retest design, which suggest a poor reliability of these measures. 5. These results suggest that the behavioral parameters of the elevated plus-maze and the behavioral despair are not stable and therefore they are possibly more related to state than trait characteristics. Therefore they appear to be not appropriate to evaluate trait characteristics which are supposed to be stable over time without treatment.

The relationship between anxiety and depression in animal models: a study using the forced swimming test and elevated plus-maze

The present study evaluated the correlation between the behavior of mice in the forced swimming test (FST) and in the elevated plus-maze (PM). The effect of the order of the experiments, i.e., the influence of the first test (FST or PM) on mouse behavior in the second test (PM or FST, respectively) was compared to handled animals (HAND). The execution of FST one week before the plus-maze (FST-PM, N = 10), in comparison to mice that were only handled (HAND-PM, N = 10) in week 1, decreased percent open entries (HAND-PM: 33.6 + or - 2.9; FST-PM: 20.0 + or - 3.9; mean + or - SEM; P<0.02) and percent open time (HAND-PM: 18.9 + or - 3.3; FST-PM: 9.0 = or - 1.9; P<0.03), suggesting an anxiogenic effect. No significant effect was seen in the number of closed arm entries (FST-PM: 9.5 (7.0-11.0); HAND-PM: 10.0 (4.0-14.5), median (interquartile range); U = 46.5; P>0.10). A prior test in the plus-maze (PM-FST) did not change percent immobility time in the FST when compared to the HAND-FST group (HAND-FST: 57.7 + or- 3.9; PM-FST: 65.7 + or - 3.2; mean + or - SEM; P>0.10). Since these data suggest that there is an order effect, the correlation was evaluated separately with each test sequence: FST-PM (N = 20) and PM-FST (N = 18). There was no significant correlation between percentage immobility time in the FST and plus-maze indexes (percentage time and entries in open arms) in any test sequence (r: -0.07 to 0.18). These data suggest that mouse behavior in the elevated plus-maze is not related to behavior in the forced swimming test and that a forced swimming test before the plus-maze has an anxiogenic effect even after a one-week interval

The relationship between anxiety and depression in animal models: a study using the forced swimming test and elevated plus-maze.

The present study evaluated the correlation between the behavior of mice in the forced swimming test (FST) and in the elevated plus-maze (PM). The effect of the order of the experiments, i.e., the influence of the first test (FST or PM) on mouse behavior in the second test (PM or FST, respectively) was compared to handled animals (HAND). The execution of FST one week before the plus-maze (FST-PM, N = 10), in comparison to mice that were only handled (HAND-PM, N = 10) in week 1, decreased % open entries (HAND-PM: 33.6 +/- 2.9; FST-PM: 20.0 +/- 3.9; mean +/- SEM; P<0.02) and % open time (HAND-PM: 18.9 +/- 3.3; FST-PM: 9.0 +/- 1.9; P<0.03), suggesting an anxiogenic effect. No significant effect was seen in the number of closed arm entries (FST-PM: 9.5 (7.0-11.0); HAND-PM: 10.0 (4.0-14.5), median (interquartile range); U = 46.5; P>0.10). A prior test in the plus-maze (PM-FST) did not change % immobility time in the FST when compared to the HAND-FST group (HAND-FST: 57.7 +/- 3.9; PM-FST: 65.7 +/- 3.2; mean +/- SEM; P>0.10). Since these data suggest that there is an order effect, the correlation was evaluated separately with each test sequence: FST-PM (N = 20) and PM-FST (N = 18). There was no significant correlation between % immobility time in the FST and plus-maze indexes (% time and entries in open arms) in any test sequence (r: -0.07 to 0.18). These data suggest that mouse behavior in the elevated plus-maze is not related to behavior in the forced swimming test and that a forced swimming test before the plus-maze has an anxiogenic effect even after a one-week interval.